No. 20-8237
Christopher Rad v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland cumulative-effect giglio-v-united-states habeas-proceedings materiality-analysis napue-v-illinois
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the cumulative effect of Brady, Giglio, and Napue violations must be considered or if an appeals court can ignore the cumulative effects and concentrate on a single violation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 7, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent