No. 20-8241
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process sentencing statutory-interpretation supervised-release
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
139 S.ct.2369 (2019) Abrogate crcnit precedest 1n U.5. v. Ward, 770 F.3d 1069 (4+h (i2.2014) Gupy +54 Supercised Belease under 18 USC Bevocation Proccedings 3583(e)(3) 55 not Eriminal7 prosentions3 2) Bail Reform Is the h85T +0 1> Violated whe Unde 1B WC 3143 (B)(I)LA), district 7}$
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Supreme Court's decision in Haymond v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2369 (2019) abrogate circuit court precedents on the supervised release revocation hearings under 18 U.S.C. 3583(e)(3)
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-07
Motion (20M88) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2021-05-18
MOTION (20M88) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2020-12-28
Motion (20M88) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2020-12-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 7, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent