No. 20-8243
Spencer Richard Andrews v. Michigan
IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment appellate-review consent consent-scope digital-privacy fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel privacy-rights search-and-seizure smartphone smartphone-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Michigan court of appeals erroneously expand the defendant's consent to retrieve a telephone number from his smartphone into a consent to search the contents of the entire phone and was state appellate counsel ineffective in failing to challenge this expansion?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L DID THE MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ERRONEOUSLY EXPAND THE DEFENDANT’S CONSENT TO RETRIEVE A TELEPHONE NUMBER FROM HIS SMARTPHONE INTO A CONSENT TO SEARCH THE CONTENTS OF THE ENTIRE PHONE AND WAS STATE APPELLATE COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE IN FAILING TO CHALLENGE THIS EXPANSION? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-05-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Spencer Andrews
Suzanne Carol Schuelke — Friedman Legal Solutions PLLC, Petitioner
Suzanne Carol Schuelke — Friedman Legal Solutions PLLC, Petitioner