No. 20-8249

Brittian Willie Young v. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech judicial-ethics standing
Key Terms:
Environmental Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's constitutional and statutory rights were violated by the respondents' actions

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : LTE MM LUTE D SAVES FELT WALIE UNE | Lett homey VS MELA DEIN] OF MLWNALQUNT bpp | ; | | Keesponderie rsa i Meee lit He Mtieth tag LETT ENTE EM Aoithan Wille fourg w/e O AL C-luson/Mhel hone lll PO Ear 2IFOL a AE BET BEALL mw LEST ESNMIED ul * A ge Lhe Lhe Liviu? o Cetienl toe We faecal af ___ aswcried gotta epaalaerect tas at late Canela _3. ALD LL OL 00021 0° LPC IAQ Lye OA ie tire 26 wre a 4 Mepal Le Qian, @ Cllecina Bl _Z 9S weald like the Cautl te reitia the De neocers Of _&. OM Be GOMIEM Epil al, avorect aie et Met O02CCL LLG Al Mhedlbecariwabibis ellicalin dity ot justice lo deng O\ aertone Le weceel 2 porta ~edwoeliy Mba LR Ik Lp ettitence £2 LGLOOLL, that Cre les. 200 courte ot vacate ? /f| * Lilt neta tale ioe of Cee peocerc ap land agital IS. eretecton ot tbat lau Litace pudeval ethies Come filo Mb guesttne sa theduty et (ustive, where Agovalete Mile mA 0 LQALO0 LASCS Kha t aS. pudoes riled 01? Log. Zz Mb motion fe erected tz fectTa Lanes, wlan bbyUdgel gee vA aint 208 S te Hbbe cate aad brted as feypondeh tof all ° £9 Va OF ee Keolalion 12 ole; he heaterance ak, LOL CLUE AL) £2 way of justice, adel tenet alee teailtsate op duly At! Chee court bas been given nelice at lite changing lafily | shaulla? Cae bean Courteopyustite teactliakeLeliee of bl Suh gracey pheoigh the COU he _ rs pagel of /0 — L£LIT OF ARTES MA aa0ties ale nol alelit Ln the LlyeViote of $pC COVEL Ope. ALL eL of all caries a) the ptoceedin “ofp Lia Ite Loucl whose cudgel, 3 Shecubvect at bidet liate tide Lllong v 51 LYZ7 Liaw hMlke. Leung, ( Peo asitonal Megat Lor tae lpoen Lateydervices) 6. _ LHILONEL 1| Davi bin, (Director PADI); MaalesL hee, Loaner Diecter— 10. LALOC), Mark benorich, (State Atturnsybenetal)y AN ¢ tral Miller, (Commecerel Logpeltd Manages Lira Daaiel Flares, Id) Waricqpe Lounly Lyoesterliut dudpe)y Lewmsaie Wt. Lanxa,| AS BL Qiekuet laut dade) Cant d, bibles, (ll. S Distoietleut Ht. FE ee bent (bane ba. Dihoitidhiife). 1, 2 OF FLU ZOLIG (ite AS. ciate and Pevrititat LS. admidifers. Mh Spree paste Lalo on \f Arizona Leour trent at. Lrivenmentalfaalty, Au Area, ra Llepertnen Tot Child Sal Vis . 4K. . _ ALL 2nalLigoactoneat at Conte O02 J A Auzenalinited liability 9808 kever ig enmuial A on oe heorneng ss .! | pyed of 10 , JRLLEG CWLN) Sf A PURISOLCI LON, oO _3| COWSTZTUYTOWAL AND SVATUIZORY PROVES ZONE. To | SATEMENT CE [WE CASE _5| AELASOMSE FUR GRAN TLNG [HE MARIE AN OCNMCLLSZON A — “MDE 22 AVENDILES. A ALLEN DEX A Onder Df Ui Cauct at Appeal: Denying Metion_— UA ALLENDE B Order RUS. Coutlat Aopeals Dismissing Appeal | ALLENDI. KL Order at CL. LIS Loic? Coutt Lim iScing C8 us A AMEN ZA L Order OL US. District Coir? Jo Stow Cause . : /3, ; 15. : {6, ae} fype F of / O 0 MELE FACTOR ILLS (ZED aA KS. Court of Aopeals No. 20-/7217 3. Us. bistet ct Cotet of AZ po lV -LOM 14k DME al : : | _2| SATTESANDRMEL _/ol _ Sypre Courtot euS. Rite hy /, | Cale | ¢ _ A a . ule £7 ls 0) OFHER ; a a Zo Amend megs, 9, Jk» | | 22 £8 USC § [254 (1) | | zl 28S. 8g PIS () | __ Mm a&bYV SCS. 5 351 (a) oo fs | : | co , Lage t of 10 y Ppiboner pepehlalygives grass Jhatlaurct of cenbiorate vesue _ lr rexenw he epee sae orders below. ‘ 7 27)/) _2| For cases from peleral courte, Lhe gator af the luted States 1) court aLenveals gan0eacs.at Apoentie Ate the petition aad is Mi rezecled ar Order. gthe grinton of the Mailed States LZ, Yytoihe court GQLULS AL AgpeaQice B to 7 the elitile and 1g Brcwatedat ACL 4g _B Fircases from federal coutks 4 the gativiote ot phe lh riled Sales 16, distuicloott l anoears at Agntiidex L Vo fhe ol H0n ants Werecorted at Crater $lhegettuir tt the Lluted Sfates A Ltirieh cour! ype. a7 Agnenidler. Dt Loe petition VI ha Sh, Lenaled at (der a _ x | | i — — Pies oF 70 A LRIS DICTION _3. euctat Aoetals decitad ny tase was March lt, 202) 30 tinelg A maker tor recat siteratiole wus piled beture mandates tpetlse. 6 oh motion te aeeceed i Parte pagers was daniany!S, orl _ the suidiction at bes Cocet ss tawobed utr

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-04-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Brittian Willie Young
Brittian Willie Young — Petitioner