No. 20-8252
Timothy James Thompson v. Brandon Kelly, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: default habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-discretion martinez-v-ryan prejudice prejudice-standard trial-counsel trial-judge
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether when assessing prejudice to determine if the default of an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim should be excused under Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), the idiosyncrasies of the trial judge may be considered?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether when assessing prejudice to determine if the default of an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim should be excused under Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), the idiosyncrasies of the trial judge may be considered? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-14
Waiver of right of respondent Jeff Premo to respond filed.
2021-06-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Jeff Premo
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Timothy Thompson
Oliver Loewy — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Oliver Loewy — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner