No. 20-8253
Blaine Keith Milam v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tags: 28-usc-2244 8th-amendment constitutional-interpretation due-process eighth-amendment federal-review habeas-corpus intellectual-disability statutory-limitation suspension-clause
Key Terms:
ERISA Punishment HabeasCorpus
ERISA Punishment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) be constitutionally interpreted to bar first-time federal habeas corpus merits review of an Eighth Amendment claim of intellectual disability?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Can 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) be constitutionally interpreted to bar first-time federal habeas corpus merits review of an Eighth Amendment claim of intellectual disability? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-20
Reply of petitioner Blaine Milam filed. (Distributed)
2021-08-09
Brief of respondent Bobby Lumpkin in opposition filed.
2021-07-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 9, 2021.
2021-07-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 8, 2021 to August 9, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-06-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Blaine Milam
Bobby Lumpkin
Tomee Morgan Heining — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Tomee Morgan Heining — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent