No. 20-8254
Demario M. Peterson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: acquitted-conduct due-process fifth-amendment jury-trial procedural-reasonableness sentencing sentencing-variance sixth-amendment substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, and this Court's jurisprudence on the procedural and substantive reasonableness of sentences are implicated when a sentencing court bases a significant upward variance on acquitted conduct?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Sixth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, and this Court’s jurisprudence on the procedural and _ substantive reasonableness of sentences are implicated when a sentencing court bases a significant upward variance on acquitted conduct? @)
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Demario Peterson
Eric George Eckes — Pinales Stachler Young & Burrell Co., LPA, Petitioner
Eric George Eckes — Pinales Stachler Young & Burrell Co., LPA, Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent