No. 20-8259
Peter James Sorokaput v. Pennsylvania
IFP
Tags: civil-rights coerced-confession constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process law-enforcement plea-bargaining sentencing wrongful-conviction
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED So Without Such evidence Did oF Ficet have Plobable cause to Stopme, Seatch me. Then he pressuted wr Force mero Confess * actime i didatconpst ef ‘ a t talks Ne +he DA aloout my set Whilehe W hy ate +hey Convict ng the imMocent, Whee has my innocence gone to? Why Wasrit f allowed ot given achance to Speak the uth Why) iniustice, Why we getting Cail(oaded inthe System, Why did f only get | Plea offer not 3, Od od a0 gravit Yy SCOlEs No PCO Crirminal Cecot | Why Wasi foulty, Wrongful) Convicted, W th alot of et fors
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-05-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2021)
Attorneys
Peter James Sorokaput
Peter Sorokaput — Petitioner