No. 20-8261
Francisco Felix v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment law-enforcement probable-cause search-and-seizure search-warrant wiretap
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment Privacy
FourthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the wiretap application failed to satisfy the requisite Fourth Amendment standard that requires exigent circumstances for an application to be approved?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the wiretap application failed to satisfy the requisite Fourth Amendment standard that requires exigent circumstances for an application to be approved? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2021)
Attorneys
Francisco Felix
Ellis Murray Johnston III — Clarke Johnston Thorp & Rice PC, Petitioner
Ellis Murray Johnston III — Clarke Johnston Thorp & Rice PC, Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent