No. 20-8269
Kenneth Ray Marshall v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254 clearly-established-federal-law constitutional-review due-process-rights federal-habeas ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment speedy-trial state-criminal-procedure strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state court failed to apply the correct standard of 'reasonableness' under Strickland v. Washington
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED |. Whether the decision of the state court that failed to apply the correct standard of “reasonableness” to assess trial counsel's conduct under : Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) is contrary to and/or . involves an unreasonable application of clearly established federal ‘Taw. 28 U.S.C., § 2254(d) (1)... cccecccecceceeescsc
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-08
Waiver of right of respondent Dexter Payne to respond filed.
2021-05-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2021)
Attorneys
Dexter Payne