Roberto Luis Rene Martinez v. United States
DueProcess FourthAmendment
When a District Court vacates a sentence pursuant to RUTLEDGE v. UNITED STATES, is a correction of the defendant's judgment and commitment order required?
No question identified. : ae QUESTION (S) PRESENTED , ; : 1. When a’ District Court vacates a sentence pursuant to the United States . Supreme Court Decision in RUTLEDGE v. UNITED STATES, 116. S.Ct 1246 , 134 L.ed. 2d 419, 517 U.S. 292 (1996). Is a Correction of the Defendants Judgment and Commitment Order required. 2. Does the District Court's failure to correct a Defendant's Judgment and Commitment Order represent a deprivation of life and liberty as defined by . the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution : 4 3. Does the District Court's refusal to correct the Judgment and Commitment order essentially create a double jeopardy? Multiple teirs of government agencies have used and will use this information to deprive Martinez of his Life and Liberty based on a count that was vacated through due process. ee . . : fd a . oo , -