No. 20-8284
Tags: appellate-court-split appellate-review criminal-justice due-process equal-protection extraordinary-reasons judicial-discretion section-3582 sentencing sentencing-disparity statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the application of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) for relief from 924(c) stacking sentences being applied inconsistently across appellate courts?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ' 1) Is it fair and equal justice for defendants who present under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), that the previously harsh 924(c) stacking is an extraordinary and compelling reason deserving , of relief be "Denied" in one Appellate Court, when the exact same issue is "Granted" in another Appellate Court?: District Courts are split on the same question even in the same circuit ; with defendants of similar backgrounds. . Oo i.
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-02
Reply of petitioner Harold Gashe filed.
2021-11-12
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-10-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 12, 2021. See Rule 30.1
2021-10-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 12, 2021 to November 11, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 12, 2021.
2021-09-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 10, 2021 to October 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-08-11
Response Requested. (Due September 10, 2021)
2021-06-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 14, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent