Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims alleging violations of his constitutional rights under the First, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments

No question identified. : & Dsl ditat S Dade hie eae hip of ph ok Greek fe) Ape Hn pe feller Supervisors poshe l, Putthomen; Yytlee 6 Pre pods CE fy, tows); MAG Sorel of Hew Yard Sfate (Lebha Fares) Te fpree Jude pose! Pla Coot'ts of Appeals Seco (veut? alors with the, Ew Baue fewe| ‘ef Said Secantl Griub Court at Appeas fo had pw Lote 5f Uy teal States Suprere laut Satire, ofescibed sw Lath y. VA 524, US FIL, YXLO) De ee Lruachee] in tow yver, quosher; havi, aflauapichy Spo in Septem py at Suc Seyppere Laat Juice Mautleke andl Fivrwrsh balig; each Geiger and freredatich/ Pocwwe] Hpermbohey Cour b oF ay Lonyforee f ut Gpty on PGE Oye peuely “sce iedl by LAM/ tii related oF Adltenltent 6 of foe Caustdston fe dbo Pile? D. Du Canbiiahin of quesha (1) ad (2); wil te Upated/ Spry . ow lewr qt Testes icor Cote g faoatre oe G Lush Ayelya Wig Ee ot facets J bend prctle/, Whe acer je Ve of papentheeaT Z 5 2 Se Up ited, C8 Lg GAL. Pp he diate / ; Wes Coutd afer? 4), Based ov peta | Super Lou fake brecthed 10 (Slick v (Spbuiel 524 US 412,483 (Vee2) Self fhe Hoptttbh. Cp fl Sushies ane Henlable Jushees ot phe uted, JS pene lay? AY G Wet of Lorhorari i foes Cate, m the whe tah of Sushoe, 0g poker ‘ Gi/ otier Prisewecs Wy bir Ser Netbeans) anf (ipect te the hrwivau'tan payin public: 2 : yy ° a OMe Lh spot tower” fight of Dae PCE aud "epull pro keto! of Ve Law aur the yuo (Pas G fect) ee) » bhaw his plrarcefiserinuaed iy} sauust Pet frome ober uel per Sipiaw with ‘ b/ ahs, piijachie Aan (él;son bud (ate iw Viglabb of P42 £2 GM 5% ppt 2 She. Lite Sorby Did i 7 | hison Sublic DeFender et.al Gnsrive sone bes deo Tr Td ti ite i UE een HOt hep Thal aneeieeeale Rawres oo the USE ae ere LIS, wow (Find The LPL Caran Ge SICTIOM LAL . . . ,