No. 20-8292
Pete Anthony Tyndale v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing divisibility due-process federal-prosecution reckless-conduct serious-violent-felony sovereign-authority state-prosecution statutory-interpretation three-strikes-statute Whether the life sentence imposed under the Federa
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the government have sovereign authority to dictate a particular state's choice in which federal law will be prosecuted other than the state according to the DUE PROCESS STANDARD of the 5TH AMENDMENT of where the alleged crime was committed?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : Questions Pre senteo | | | ; [Does the governmert have swereign . | | . ‘author: ly to dictate. q particular state , | . its choice in whieh Q federal | ral will be prosecuted other Man the state according to the. DUE | | [PROCESS STANDARD of the STH a AMMEHOMENT of where the alleged © Crime was committed? r) .
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 12, 2021)
Attorneys
Pete Tyndale
Pete Tyndale — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent