No. 20-8305

Gersu Guisao v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights collateral-review due-process federal-review habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-proceeding martinez-v-ryan material-witnesses new-evidence newly-discovered-evidence procedural-standard
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the initial review collateral counsel breach his fiduciary duty by waiving three of four claims that included critical expert and material witnesses

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1, Did rekawwred initval review collateral counsel breach his fudieiary duty by waiving three of | four acounds +Hrat included the eritical expect | And. material witnesses, once again Avarlable to testify? 2, lohether wawmg Asolstantial ground in . An initial cevied collateral proceeding vs tanta moony to rer having raised the ground Lor the purposes of a Mactinez federal reuiens® % Wherhec"new' evidence Sor the purpose of the actval\~ Vanocence. Qyrreday of Perkins neludes | reliable evidence that was ausilable lout nel resented At trial, Wwrhal ceuiew collateral anc Boaeea\ proceedings, or if, instead, must be newly discovered, previously veauadable evidence ? | | |

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-15
Waiver of right of respondent Mark S. Inch, et al. to respond filed.
2021-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 14, 2021)

Attorneys

Gersu Guisao
Gersu Guisao — Petitioner
Gersu Guisao — Petitioner
Mark S. Inch, et al.
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent