Gersu Guisao v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Did the initial review collateral counsel breach his fiduciary duty by waiving three of four claims that included critical expert and material witnesses
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1, Did rekawwred initval review collateral counsel breach his fudieiary duty by waiving three of | four acounds +Hrat included the eritical expect | And. material witnesses, once again Avarlable to testify? 2, lohether wawmg Asolstantial ground in . An initial cevied collateral proceeding vs tanta moony to rer having raised the ground Lor the purposes of a Mactinez federal reuiens® % Wherhec"new' evidence Sor the purpose of the actval\~ Vanocence. Qyrreday of Perkins neludes | reliable evidence that was ausilable lout nel resented At trial, Wwrhal ceuiew collateral anc Boaeea\ proceedings, or if, instead, must be newly discovered, previously veauadable evidence ? | | |