No. 20-8312
Ronald Delester Burke v. Washington
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination nurse-examiner sexual-assault sexual-assault-nurse-examiner sixth-amendment testimonial-statements
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Confrontation Clause prohibit a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner from testifying about statements made during a forensic examination by an adult sexual assault complainant who is unavailable to testify at trial and has not previously been subjected to cross-examination?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment prohibit a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner from testifying about statements made during a forensic examination by an adult sexual assault complainant who is unavailable to testify at trial and has not previously been subjected to cross-examination? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-14
Waiver of right of respondent Washington to respond filed.
2021-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Ronald Burke
Mark Bruns Middaugh — Middaugh Law. PLLC, Petitioner
Mark Bruns Middaugh — Middaugh Law. PLLC, Petitioner
Washington
Theodore Michael Cropley — Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney, Respondent
Theodore Michael Cropley — Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney, Respondent