Whether the respondents, M. Rodriguez, et al., used excessive force by using a deadly gas spray to deter petitioner, which violated petitioner's constitutional rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. NaeTHe THE Resfondevtts, (11. Rodriguez, eteal., EXCES— SIVE USE OF cladl ronde by using a daddy Gis sPhayY deter Pethonen comPhed us orden.To Go wiside THE tel. 2. NwetentHe KesPandents, In, odriguez. etal, matiaiousl dn& sadishedly use a deadiy ads srrdy dausinG Harm—to Kethoner rathec Tuan ina Good Faith errontto maintam on restore disciple . 3. Waemuerc THe Reswondent. M. Raduiauez , etal. acted witha auledhle sttfe o— mm& by using drad)y Gas sendy Torucds Vethonen ma small Reorl) Ven Filate® cell wituout decontammatinG Fon. more THA one) Hour. CausMG FethonER TO SUFFEIC. ASHordMESS ar breath. ited eve Pain aod neinly 18s _ouT4, WweTen THE Resrondkuts, IN. hoddeeuez etal. , went delberateh mddrrercent to setous med) ea needs Bectuse THEY deut believe tHIT Pethone was exposed wit a deadly Gets sent Anh enone. HAT Pethonen as YellinG msike THE G£// For. me hodl emenGeney. i