Ricardo Valdez v. Walker, C.O., et al.
I.) Can FedRule. Civ. Proc Go(bl) be Use For The Purpose of obTaining Relie
From The operation Judsement, when Exceptional Circumstances existed such
as in:(Klaperott v.U.S. 335 2.5. 601, 613(194a) ("Civil deFendanT wh0 was
Till, penniless and incarserated and ThereFore Unable To Appeak and defend its
Case, granted relief)
2.) If The Answer is Yes on Question abore, I would Then like To know if qticir
Court of Appeal errd when it Isnored m4 Contention. of Fed R. civ Po bolblGl
where I Contended That Excertional Circumstances existed in Case because PlaintiFF
didrit SPeak Englishwas IlletergTe: hal a GPAof 2:0 Citins (Gil V. Vosilano 131 F.Jure
2d 486, H94 (S. D. N.4.20oi) (Relief Grante becquse PlainTiff did noT understand ProCedurts de To its anguase difficulties). DisT Court Ignored PlaintifFs ConTention
AdJress FedR. Civ. Roc COb it adress ConTendns ThaT PlainTifF was Usins Fed R Ci
Proc 6Ob) as a 2nd Appeal. When PlantifF aT No PoinT was Usins FedR. Civ Proc 60)
To Attack Underluihs Judsement.
Can Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) be used for the purpose of obtaining relief from the operation of a subsisting, final judgment, when exceptional circumstances existed, such as in Klapprott v. U.S., 335 U.S. 601, 613 (1949)