No. 20-8331

Charlene Walker Rosa v. Michael J. Satz, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-17
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: attorney-client-confidentiality civil-rights due-process equal-protection fair-trial prosecutorial-misconduct
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state attorney's opening statement at the prosecution's closing argument violated the accused's right to due process and a fair trial

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |. Whethur The sloke AY turney $ Opie BS tha prosecud ving abdereay S4 the Gouuu mand dott alt ag Ela to tht Tudg ound Samkemen of tor, he Credich the pre Secu oM to his Ad et the dopom $0. BAF VY urn Ne long arg urn, ound Cock Thad the Case to which the dspomen ory WAS noprecard fo prous tinudh WM {he tharos 4 WSS adbosary) Woe tormuroded WA AYNM pro Lrding W Favor % the accuse. . HR. Whothoyr Uk is Lawful fm a Skate Prokecud ng attorney @ thea Avurnwunk te Claw B \udourent amd Sembee og toy duking | As Clos ung argumunk We Chai The yvosecution folds abladan he ry Credsly Bid yo truth WIN rngggn se ong Bretireyh eae by accuser an Queso aenened to the warded To Wich sha wes Wang nied oy thi Hake 26 @ SMH cfondasd on an OR Lom ak Ur theory: oun 4, wWhoiwy AL rocks wie tom ae obtain OM amy oer Jom ov from ob Coun Whar the wid) dasa adkornay 3 ier anne Cone Ekihaaduatortad syphunn and the stacke Chad eR? yrresecuutccW] to the dyuuse AITO TAyNS CHAR y %4 Trusth and the UY Lung counts had thot Rab nvr \S Youd oy bau orton Make reckoy: . It Whether a difamse artornay wno Cmedes te share Meare ee ae adebary Could how Ws Clans Dads dua nh sie fh Milt eg cH My Trem anduiceds aterny-Auat confident ry resulted doh 5. Whey The shake Prson.ovrome Wahitions prosecution whure ghe show thed The pra procad Wg emdad i Paver othe acoused. thm the ses coli ood Pree cutiM Ywocaatng where two dagamse attornar Yussnaprasondesl te ie Case to POUR Trudy aad AUN ne Proseuuber cloned ourquvaand, 12 cn ng Gagemsa akror ner) creado key of trudhh onthe pe (om, Father Y dd A susvornl Sypumendtad fend tas (hue bp guneaetsaer a WW, ARR 2 CON O yuiiod rey tar rth Vinod priv Spe cae Sag benim inake” duniag the Crue receding ! b: Wolter Ha wan caus dadrcratiry Ob The THe! trocand img Wes Oiscruniakion on tha laasis AW accuse Nakonal ont un a8 A Samo cam. Sebbvig Tha pace od uthar grocerd Waly. . ; w. _ _ Qwtlonty Presorded Conlinad and the prosecutor to MMR, ov) the accuse, Eyth Aanandoace ___|rigids ound te hor hur ~Untote St dur the exumunal prial _. | prousdng afbor, 42 UAVS Mon Ads ahormt SalyLricrumnodlee, | finland foi epnesendased),and Assonts Thad She und ooh ong Was wot suvoltiad M~he crume to Which su Woslosing tried Nor bor alone, violates wn Cqu0d yroladion dividual wrylds ond adoring Cwwch Comgidentiohsne 8 \Whathour Poltonen is Wound a hee triol adhorne rodeyiy gh W03 Mods offer, she mov.2 the Count Jo Asch dg. WWW wor ag Wares} ond Wyormad the Cod thot Thor 0117} salen < _ Ces eater SS UN-neSolv@. Ottorna Cwack Come lit @ % Oiscrumincteelf fond vidusiforiod adtorway thas, vould “asiehetend hur taboked mills ead anes this Co ids Ackiow . io. NWhathor thisisa Gone t “Cage WW, the Cosa 4 ety 2h, Elurd da VChorle we fey 6 Youkugt ov 06 /20/d00% Wwhon the chore 7 1.Murdur on the fut dgre anda. Solid [Ho Comm sored frothy was harmunabd Favor of the accuse, amd, to Contiauad yrosecutiol Mn Tune 25 throug Tuly s, root Wag tactical Oocision to Cnedsk the (oso cull to bo Lecuged AbYomso. akkorviaw W\ OM attonyled fo Wrens Wy Comvicked tho accuse, ,Wn owing thak hoy doyems. other na renal te he his _ Qdvoary Trbores amd-tlrodk bis Chard sal Lose hur piYds Shoo Auiembiomal deouflion and Molt oo, | _: . i ithe The Wn Sloakay ic Oucisun othe gorkeg , Q wr ovgredsted culunvail dyjemse Coumsel by tne Www Coos wn the age a halen (host. Shake oy Clorida,am atta emdthe _. waemank ond Sembee rxyored the fac amd Low thot __ [Atha “case, of | Stata of Elida v-ChoMone thosa wos Loyalhy ond Lal daclared anvabidakd m the ONG a§ flocaakng 7 ___| had miso Ww) Feworr of ANd accused OM 06 /20/ Aoot Aluegered Z Case V0! 0$-/UGb CE. Thsse fone The yrdgounat and Sombre. OY 04] 05/ r00% (aga 10! 04 lop at cFioW Coumt ong 4 dhe WiVolidated . Cass, Show Fraud) a Chari cal Mis fision . : __ | Covad Wado the Lack thot; 01 08/93/A0041he Pere, atoll Lo : mand anh Cr cuct Coumt disverchon orden wes ombered on wolle fidtogus ERG WO! 0F-(UUY exo moth Comm ont and W

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2021-12-01
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-28
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2021-10-04
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 19, 2021)

Attorneys

Charlene Walker Rosa
Charlene Rosa — Petitioner
Charlene Rosa — Petitioner