No. 20-8338

Mark Woods v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review civil-procedure court-of-appeals district-court due-process final-judgment jurisdiction mandamus writ-of-procedencia
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Abused Its discretion in denying petitioner's Writ of Procedendo ad Judicium or Mandamus or Otherwise

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i, Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Abused Hs discrefion In denying petfoner’s Writ of Procedendo ad Dudicium er Mendomus or Otherwise. ; | Qe Whether PelHoner is entited to the relief Sousht as the lxver agpellabe. — Court only hove Sorisdichon of Appeals from all Final decisions of the distict Courts of the United Statess 28 USC See. 1241.

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 16, 2021)

Attorneys

Mark Woods
Mark Woods — Petitioner
Mark Woods — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent