Question not identified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED QUESTION 1: Whether the failure to include testing and treatment of Lyme spirochete Bb as a pre-trial requirement of all criminal and most civil cases under the 42 USC 1983 Federal Civil Rights Act, particularly in the West annotations, section 2766 Medical care, pretrial detainees, generally , section 2767 Serious medical need, medical care, pretrial detainees, section 1603 Medical malpractice, deprivation of constitutional or statutory rights, and section 1604, Medical service, deprivation of constitutional or statutory rights, because of a number of sometimes conflicting developments in the science of medicine, 1) efforts to conceal Lyme asa germ warfare agent since about 1993 in the early stages of the Bill Clinton presidency, and 2) the uncanny ability of the Lyme spirochete, hereinafter Bb, to almost instantaneously sense danger from antibiotics and curl up into a ball and exude a wax protective shield or protective film or biofilm and thereafter remain inside the biofilm and inactive even for years until danger passes after Bb senses danger in the form of antibiotics or even soap and antiseptics, greatly reducing the intended effect antibiotics and pre-surgical cleaning, had until 2013 discovery of stevia as an ajuvant, resulted in widely held beliefs that lyme was a fictitious disease. : . QUESTION 2: Whether the 2016 election of Donald Trump has led to the . acceptance of the 300 world wide Lyme species as no longer being a fictional disease. In 1999-2000 one ILADS founder, Dr Joe Burrascano, MD of the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society, hereinafter ILADS, was sued ; and brought into a civil trial in Manhattan, New York City on charges brought by the New York State Medical Boards in a deprivation of license trial, for about a one year trial in 1999-2000, on 33 charges basically alleging Burrascano was wrongly practicing medicine to treat a non-existent or fictional disease, prosecuted for his discoveries regarding Lyme disease then thought to be a fictional disease and use of more powerful antibiotics than others had previously used to fight Lyme. Burrascano won on 30 charges and had to do minor remedial work on the other : three charges, thanks, it is reported, to a judge who had personal knowledge that Lyme was not fictional. : QUESTION 38: Will this court now order testing and treating of Lyme as a necessary pre-trial test and treatment in all criminal and hopefully most civil cases. In many criminal cases, there is an appearance of criminal activity where in fact the behavior was largely or solely caused by a brain infection with Lyme and/or the Questions Presented for Discussion in this Petition for Certiorari Pagei Page ii Rickettsia Helvetica or Swiss Agent, created a backlog of wrong or incorrect trials in nearly all criminal and most civil cases in the nation’s courts since the discovery of the Lyme spirochete in 1981 by Willi Burgdorfer at the Hamilton, Montana laboratories of the US government called Rocky Mountain Laboratory (see p 11, Bitten, The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons by Kris Newby, ISBN 978-0-06-289627-8, Harper Colllins Books 2019), and the great ' advances in treatment once thought difficult or impossible because of the ability of Lyme Spirochetes to exude a wax coating making a biofilm to protect the spirochetes from antibiotics, now not as large a factor with ajuvant stevia first ; announced at the 2013 ILADS convention in San Diego as part of a Masters Thesis program by Dr Eva Sapi at the University of New Haven, Connecticut, in a contract authorized through Dr Burrascano and the University of New Haven. There is continuing research on an about 20 percent minority of Lyme Spirochetes not now : fully treatable with the adjuvant stevia and regiilar antibiotics. QUESTION 4: Whether the STEVIA ajuvant with a wonderful beneficial effect on Lyme treatment, first researched, discovered and announced for presentation at the 2013 ILADS conf