Questions Presented

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED _ I On third direct appeal, did the fractionally different appellate Panel plainly err by failing to force district court compliance (mandate rule) with the original (majority) panels published, ; now widely cited (including by this court) opinion and order; . ; violating both laws of the case and circuit by imposing a longer . term of imprisonment and harsh supervised release than ordered in . the first direct appeal, affecting my substantial due process rights? II Does the (vehemently) dissenting minority judges reappearance on a subsequent appellate panel, affirming a non-compliant judgment with language and views very similar to the original dissent; convey an appearance of impropriety and panel shopping? TIl Do the accumulative judicially biased errors (causing me to linger in the prison system longer than decided in the first appeal) , within this widely cited case require reversal, for more meaningful appellate review; to maintain integrity of the process, uniformity of decisions thus preserving public reputation and the appearance of justice? : i .