No. 20-8345
Ricky Parkerson v. United States
Tags: burden-of-production burden-of-proof confrontation-clause due-process sentencing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Circuit's practice of shifting the burden of production and proof to the defendant at sentencing violates a defendant's Due Process rights as well his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Fifth Circuit’s practice of shifting the burden of production and proof to the defendant at sentencing violates a defendant’s Due Process rights as well his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation? 2. Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily encompasses some degree of reweighing the sentencing factors? ii
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-01
Reply of petitioner Ricky Parkerson filed. (Distributed)
2021-11-15
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-10-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 15, 2021.
2021-10-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2021 to November 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 15, 2021.
2021-09-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 15, 2021 to October 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-08-16
Response Requested. (Due September 15, 2021)
2021-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 19, 2021)
Attorneys
Ricky Parkerson
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent