Whether the district court had proper subject-matter jurisdiction over parties' § 1983 claims

No question identified. : : QUESTION CG) PRESSES TED 1) prep THE CougT OF APPEALS EK mPLOPERLY REVLES!) NE ovo TSssuE OF LAW OF WHETHER HDUSTLICT _ CoueT HAD GALA SUBTECT -MATTER JURLISDECTxTad ove paeTzEs $1983 CLAEmS * . EE pea : LIST OF PA@TLES . | . Aaron Joyner, Daren Greme, Zchuard! &. Tisdale, Tr, / Sam Shaye , Fhomas Com marches 3S. Coaram, Mo, Afas, and Jae Dow, Deferdas, . hese E. Hertel, Plant Appellant Absbine~ — : . BELATED CASES | Heria Merrtolt us. Aaron Fyne, etal. Case Ao. G:)9-Cv626Dev—KFm , A ppellade Ap. 'Cs) * 19-6646 : a 20Fo9s © Sane Dee i3 Known as “Us. Dalbers a “TAGLE OF. AUTHOR TEES CITED . , OT PG.) CASES s Bell v. Hooed , 32F-US. 6, 66 SCH PFS ae L.R2d 383, 90.4.9. i ee HE Bose, Corp. v. Con Sumers Cion ot hd States The, 46 US. p 485, lof 5.CH. 1997, 80L.Ed. 24502. 2 2 we ad a Care Choices Ho v. Engstrom, 380 Bd PG, 732 |, Ul Noe v. Chao, Sil Fad Yel, U5 (44Cr 2007). 2. es 14 Liven bon Sa dmission Corp. v. Dudes, 13 F.3d Hl, 75 — ASLO. 2d BIC 44Er 2008),, ee 16: — Dillloan ~ Stan dard v: Sw 456 US. 28% 02 Sich 1789, Oh SEC v. Basie. Enery CA bated hes. Lac., 273 LE 3d 65% 665C64Cr 2001). 22 2 ee tl Shaw v. AAA Engencerin & drathng Tne. , 138 Fed. Ay. 62,2015 Wh ped ne ne el Stade Farm Mat Auto Ins. CG. v. Marv aez, WE ad 1264 1290-71) Cloth Gr. 198%). ee 10 Stee | Co. v. Citizers be A Bethe Env 532 YS. §3,. 94-95, 1185.C# 1003 WoL. Ed. 2d 2/0 O98)... tl US. v. Corda, Land Situated Lr CH Of Detroit 361 Fad 305 C64Cy 200d). 2. -4% 27 oe. STATUTES AND RULES | 28 USCA. $ 1/253 28 USCA, Sf 1292 GC!) 23 U3.¢.4, § 210/(c) 28 U5.0.A. § 2106 a a FRAP Rule 52 Ca) MAL ROG. _ TABLE OF ConTEWTS . LASLE OF COMTEATS 7. PGC). OPIMEAOS BELOW \ /. Sdersdnerx o4) . CondsTzrTuTxosa lL. AWD STATUTORY PROVESTONS KAWDLVER 3 6. STATEMEWT OF THE CASE Zq. ARGUMENT 7 Ht-/o. | Cow Clusxrea) / 4: LAODEX Fo EXHZBITS Se . EXHr@xtT 4 Pelidnner's Grvevasce dled F/28/4F$ Arr LeTree /OebEre Sufeeme couer (STATE ) dated Jane 21, 2019 182). ExHZ@x=T OG Petitioners Grieance dated T//0/ 2019 Aw Case History REPS RT; : ; ‘22-26, EXHEBIT CC CoueTer APPEALS ORDERS AUB PEL curray 22-32. : SORREME Couet oF Tile SULTED STATES , ; PETIT Tan me wert or CERT1r06 Aer Pelibonerresell, Pas Mota bot eoerborars’ aus Yo reves the jedgmerd be Ce ee , OPIVIAS BELO) , CF bor ease fom Federn/ Courks 2 . . The gainron of He riled Shales cout ataroeah ak Exhbit C to the pebben ard bs CT reported av. pec ‘ reported; or , The op niva of Lhe hailed Shobas dy shict coutat Eq reported ar. yo Chas heen desiynelecl for eu bhica bor Lotus net yef ho LEGAL MAN | MAIL ROO; , Juers pre rire) . The dade on whch Ay ikl Sholeg CouttLyaah . dhenrded LY CAR avas Norske 242020 Tare pelibon for rehearing eras Aimaly hiked in ny —_ Case. ; Ea A tome bibs, fr rebearriy ions wae He LE Comet haa on hu follosrhy . ft. aod acepy of Ube, ordedenying reheat A Exchibid CIA WEA of bm. to hh the pebben Lr @ cst a A pelcaten Jp. A —_—___.The jurisdietion oF thes Courts iwoked trlr 2605 CPSU) | LEGAL man . Z. MAIL Rrrins _ ConstrtuTriovAl. Add STATUMBEY MeovrszedS LAOVolveb l. YUS.c.A. Const. Amend . m= provides : — Congress sh all make no Jaws respecting anes tabksh inert of relslon, or probi biting the. Pee exercse thereof or abrid, in the tree don of speech, on of te press; ; Or the TEL te k ce abl +> ass enbh, and % . regres Pee peace] 7 petton he Crovernmen é fea redress of grievances, . ' 2. ASCA. Const Amend. VI provides : . Excessive ba: / shell not be ry uived, Ner PACKS, foes . : imposed, nor erue | and Unuglg punts ments bhehd . 3. WS.c.A. Const. Amend. XV Sect, [ provides : , . All pesoos born. or natura lzed in the. United States, : and aubjeet +> te (aris dicton thereof, are otiens of ) Phe. United Gloles and of He Stale coherein the, reside. Wo State shall make or entores, ey Jo cohtch LM abrde the privileges orimmunites of ot aers of te Uhhed Stafes norshell an State hprive ai esSOn of He 3 Y ror , Her$y or prepery, without dus Process of QW5 NOr phen ve aay pusen c