No. 20-8354
Lewis Wesley Hickman, III v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-history criminal-procedure due-process evidence-challenge felony-conviction judicial-review mandatory-minimum plea-bargaining sentencing-disparities sentencing-enhancements sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the sentencing enhancements were properly applied
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . . : . ; A yw 4 why waS My 3 points tor accepting reseonsil ty taken Ror o Simele font in seal. 4 didvit Know , thy Quy Was oO “Coopecertor ) didnt Know him : at all. Why was Ft iver & ® point enhomement Lor Suse] Drreaten use oF violence Por a Stoke charge yak Was dism sed? Why do = not n~ 5 Year enhancement or OA mandaron MTMAM ok Is years Por 0 “Sodous dry Belony”, when Tve Weer een Convicted ot ran x SariouS ory Pelony’
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Lewis Wesley Hickman
Lewis W. Hickman III — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent