No. 20-8362
Damion Sleugh v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy constitutional-rights criminal-conspiracy criminal-law due-process fifth-amendment judge-made-law Pinkerton-liability substantive-offense substantive-offenses
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess
FifthAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a defendant be found guilty of a substantive offense based on Pinkerton liability where that offense was not an object of the alleged conspiracy?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. May a defendant be found guilty of a substantive offense based on Pinkerton liability where that offense was not an object of the alleged conspiracy? 2. Should this Court limit to its facts or overrule Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946), as judge-made federal criminal law in derogation of United States v. Hudson, 11 U.S. 32 (1812)? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 21, 2021)
Attorneys
Damion Sleugh
Ethan Atticus Balogh — Balogh & Co., APC, Petitioner
United States of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent