Did the district court err by suppressing evidence illegally seized with a warrant obtained by the use of false statements violating Petitioners' Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 1) Did the district covet err by wotsuppressing evidence illegally seized with a azareh warmans+ aquired by the use of He offionrs False statements violating Petitioners Fourth and Foodeenth Amendment righis, (Dee 4,2017, Final Motion Hr Te, 80-120), : 2) Did, the district court violate the Petizioners Sixth Amersdimentright 40 fore his accuser by use of coercion to waive Covfrotation Clause by threat of harsher sententce and jury ios chilling his decision 49 eross-examine the roti (Teie\ Ve Vel 3. 401-416)