No. 20-8373

Kevin Herriott v. Associate Warden Ford, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights discovery due-process federal-review habeas-corpus jurisdictional-requirements legal-mail mail-room procedural-law standing state-court-conviction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the court of appeals misunderstood the governing rule of law that the right to discovery was predicated upon?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : | , Ouest rows) Leese TrED | , 1) DID THE CoueT OF APPEALS MISUNDERSTOOD THE GOVERUIW & RULIF OF hid THAT THE RIGHT Fe Axrscovery WAS PREDECATED UPon)? | : LEGAL MAIL 7 , MAIL ROOM © . LIST @©F PARTIES | . Wayne Me Cale, thea Ford, Maretson Smith, Feoseoh Cannhg, Neferdarks. | Beoln Z. Herre tt, Phir ME / hygellant | Revaren CASES . . | : Beale EHep-fo lf vs, M-. Ford, «tal | . a 7 Case 0.56:/9co 25/~Dewk Fat , LEGAL MAIL . MAIL ROOM — TABLE OF AUTHORZTXIES CLTED : . . P&G). Bane uv. Spencer, 3973 F2d /o& C54 Cie. 968), » op ee . e AG: Davis vu. Murcer Medex! Rasearcly foun dahon, Dre, 213 F Suge. 3d 2, : Li Vnots State Emphyees Anion, Coane! 34 Aun. [ederabon Stoke, . Count avd Municipal Zep lopees , AFL~ciho v. Lecsts, ’ ADR BE Ad SOI... AD, Tn re Coles, J2d Fad at 63, a | 3 Tr re Under Seal, 249 Fd 2%6 C2 Cir. 20M) oo. Ke Cann v. aewoman Terevecabls Trust, 458 Fed 281, 287 (3d Cin 2006). . ., oof Lo . . . « 18,20. Me Kenna V. Pre. Rail Serv, 32. K.Gd 820, 329-30 C3d Cir. J99d)., CR ee ew ee WB Py Mee u Colhmbla Broadcasts Spskea, Lne., 368 OS. 4ey $73, ; ID SH BE DL Ed. 2d U8, ee ll STATUTES AND RULES — 23 Ys.C S/USA : : , 28 US.C.§ 636 Cb) ; 42. GS.C.§ 1983 LEGQa Pts). | ’ ra 713 FRAP Rukw 25.,.. 7, 6, coe | if FR2P Rule JZ). 2 2 a 7 “seine 26@)OME). Us . i. 3d@ 2 a , | | LEGAL MAIL | MAIL ROOM : TABLE OF CONTEWTS Oe Peacs) OPIW Ios BELOW I. | ODuUers brer Lon) 2. , Aap sTaTuroey Peavistads DNOLVER_Ffo STATEMEAIT OF THE CASE i ek ALUM EIT /0-2o0. 2h ConeLus rea) | Apex ro £XHXBLTS EXATeBxcT A (3) usm-285 Foems 22-30. EXHIar7T 2B C1) mamate AGRZEMZNT Fo AEBET £.H. COOPER. Actes ECE ZPT, ASD (1) ZDomatre Gelevaner Foe“ 31-34 @ EXHIB&rT Cc Tubamen T, ODEs PER curram QTHER Kootnoles ; 2 l@) LEGAL MAIL a MAIL ROOM Co ) Kd THE . : . SUPREME ceueT OF THE UVLTED STATES © . PerxT Lon) Fee WET OF CERTOGALT Pedi Hone respecthdh prys Hota pebibon fo. core of” Certorars WSue to reviews Phe, judgment behes. OPLOIedSS BELO tit oe tvf For cases From kedoral courts s | , The op inlea of the United St-oles Court of appuls to te | EY reported. a os | “LY has ben designated for poblic.aton buf Zs notiyet repored or, | | : Juersoxr certo, 0 CASES from federal C. ourks s decided. my case vas A)ovember 23,2020. . , CY wo thon for re hearin “Was Led, Ell is m ec. | ee Ma domed, dvben for reheacn Was denied Z Mh an | Unchd hohe Court of A peaks o> Ve Dn | date Decembe© / Z220, ond a copy of The . | Orde denying rehearhg Q porars at Zchbt C. , ny An extension of hme both Yhe. pedebon hr cori OF cerboran’ was grarted ro art nchodlng , —_ Cdakeon Cae) in A pphe.adter wo. —— A. : | ee “The urtoletion of tis C. cu 33 Jner bed inde~ 28 S.C. | 8 125901). | | Const TU TZoWSAL. AND STATUTORY (Ov TSBWS Lovewran ; ; Con reSS shel make no heed fespectin 7 aN est ahlyhrnert. _ of relsin, or prohbiting Ye. Pr theres, _ or We the tree dont of speech, orof he press; or : Yhe. right Ae poph poeaceaby % assernth, endo pedden the Government fora rebvas of grievances. OO , oe (2. U.S.C.A. Coast A mend. Va provides . co , on impose, norcruel and unusua [ puntchmen te ible bed, . 8 asch. Cond Amead XE stetin |. provides 2 . All ersoas born onatu-al-eed ja the ited Slabes, ; and. Subject ro Ye. jarisdicbon th reot, are otzers of He MbihedShales and of He Shik csherein ES pe Stok ahll male Or enforce Ws res L ey i » shal abrid Ybe privik cS Or jomunibes © , chews of the dod Shales; hog Shae . deprive oy Persson of /te, Vberty or Property, cohort dee (TOES of lous: 70cany wy Qn Person LEGALMAILONLY 3 | | 4 kd Slaks Cok Anobhd There © OTe cosh shell ests, bohee dhe behy, sf kevbh, fy ayy event AS S00N as prache ahh wh. he herby, a Le mg lala ma ean (| achen Ja cohreh @ erisoneseeks a rednas fron a sorrmonenlal sntby op off op oo enmply of @ governmental enbfy. | _ or Ls mrss be Complant, Or ary porkon of Me Corny : tbe complant -: . , | is Lrivohas, mebeirus, or hod teckh ache, yon edhred, reltongy be. grerted: or | seks menetay rob bona

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-22
Brief of respondents Associate Warden Ford, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Associate Warden Ford, et al.
Andrew Frederick LindemannLindemann & Davis, P.A., Respondent
Andrew Frederick LindemannLindemann & Davis, P.A., Respondent
Kevin Herriott
Kevin E. Herriott — Petitioner
Kevin E. Herriott — Petitioner