Whether the district court erred in failing to give deference to the state supreme court's determination that petitioner's administrative remedies had been exhausted

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | | | | : | : WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO GIVE DEFERENCE TO THE STATE SUPREME. COURT'S DETERMINATION THAT PETITIONER'S ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES HAD BEEN EXHAUSTED. | WHETHER THE DISTRICT/COURT ERRED IN REFUSING TO CONSIDER PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIM VIOLATIONS: THAT THE STATE SUPREME COURT'S RETROACTIVE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 2003 AMENDMENT. TO THE ALASKA DNA I.D. REGISTRATION ACT,AS: APPLIED: TO PETITIONER, WHOSE CONVICTION PRE-DATED THE OPERATION OF THE DIRECTIVES OF THE STATUTE WHICH CAME INTO BEING AS AN EXISTING LAW, AND PUNITIVE “LY SANCTIONED NONE SOMPLIANCE, WITHOUT OFFEND~ ING: THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE 14TH AM=NDMENT AND THE EX POST FACTO 7..CLAUSES OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION-ART 1,SECTION 10. ! | | (i)