Whether the trial court erred in its handling of the evidence presented against the defendant

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED TE evidence Presantad ot trie hos uloondtunf iadicakions Of ota fats 06 tontaminoted. oc2 nok evidentiary 44Pec isl Forhwiciens (uso Processed tha evidence olerianted by ROotdott oc loudio be ecacant wt ial for COOKS OuuMneHion. cund Rontromtation? . . . Tt toonsal fo defendant Was ostrshalmina indications Wet evidenced Pcasanted nadinst oid defendeet, is false or touted . ddas counsel nk havd oo atitimal chiiaakion to challtnat of ok Vash tonidock ec easel? uesh astion wd Ae cwest ron alae eUdente bs PACU iF He evidence ic materialt tne Case? _ . TA toonsel to defendant ciceries information alosto. tanked Pra-tcrerl identiGeakiOnrof defendant during tried, dows tounrel ADT HUe oh minimel Doliaatiod to ok least dondoct o U0ach) insti serio eseecadhlik dae Sole wouter t for ine Adonsa wos wisidenti Fi eabion?