No. 20-8389
Asa Lea, aka Asa Lorenzo-Lamiyah Lea v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment criminal-procedure district-court-error exclusionary-rule illegal-evidence judgment-of-acquittal motion-for-new-trial motion-to-suppress search-and-seizure tangible-evidence
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court erred by denying Mr. Lea's Motion to Suppress Illegal Tangible Evidence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented 1. Whether the District Court erred by denying Mr. Lea’s Motion to Suppress Illegal Tangible Evidence? 2. Whether the District Court erred by denying Mr. Lea’s Motion to Suppress Illegal Statements? 3. Whether the District Court erred by denying Mr. Lea’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal? 4. Whether the District Court erred by denying Mr. Lea’s Motion for New Trial? il Parties and Related Cases The names of all parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. There are no
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 23, 2021)
Attorneys
Asa Lea
William Lawrence Welch III — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
William Lawrence Welch III — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent