Must Petitioners attorneys' mistake or inadvertence in not introducing evidence of history of retaliation from the side of at least one of the Defendants be counted as mistake or inadvertence under Rule 608 Fed.R.Civ.P.?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED @ Must Petitioners attorneys! mistake ad bral of not introducing evidence of history of retattotion prom the Srde op at Teast one of the Dofendowts be Counted as mistake Cor] inaduerenee’ Under Rule G08 Fed.R.Civ.P! , ) Pid Pokitroner’s reasonable (atbeit witsueaspill to Ori sucht his od forneys Mistake secure pieeiaee inadverence” depinition under Rule 608 Fed .R.Civ.P? | (3) Did such "mistake Cor] inodverente" prejudie Dobitranar ? J) Should Petitioner be granted a new tial on the mottor!