Should a mandated order issued by a United States Appeals Court be struck down by a decision of a United States District Court, subjecting a plaintiff to consecutive appeals and bringing the civil case to the door of the Statute of Limitations?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED @ 1. e -@-: -Should a: Mandated order issued by a United States:Appeals Court mrs $ Tr [Specifically, the Hon. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals] be struck.down : eo aD by a decision of a United Statés District District Court Oo ry > the Middle District-Florida, that it did-not agree with the mandated decision. me oe ~ Henceforth, stibjecting a plaintiff, to consecutive appeals to ‘reverse, arid by that ® very same conduct of the District Court-the longevity of those appeals-bring the $ ' civil case to the door of the Statue of Limitations. Is this the Justice-and Judicial @ system that the United States represent. Further, should this type conduct be $ tolerated by the United States District Court-Middle District Fl. in removing access @ to the Courts for indigent individuals. [Those that are not represented-or cannot — ® afford counsel. Furthermore, would it be considered violation of a Civil Liberty of D4 the US Constitution, being that one of the five key-civil liberties is “the right to @ petition the government for redress of grievances [ Wherefore, why would the $ appellant, be denied this privilege]. [2] Did the District Court, abuse discretion in @ holding case from progress up near Statute of Limitations? though case is timely sd filed D4 . @ e@ @ ® ® @ e \@ J ) e . sd em e. Renee D. Bell v. Florida Highway Patrol Et.al./US Bank Natl. Assoc. Leader Mortgage, Et.al. 05/02/2021 e e:.