Whether the denial of post-conviction relief violated the Petitioner's due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment

No question identified. : | Question Freserfel | lbes appellate Counsel petective (or OF hg fo woke al / chages within Redibiowers Sect appeal enguement {ey the speech trial violation ° | | ! , Brties Retitiqwoec, pro se: Claveuce O Hop kins, TDac# 2OYS 83, OQ Box (000 Nevavct, Ll, C2ASF | Bespopreyst-. | wweame acu! Atorvey Gereral, 106 wi, Pasololh . 127 Flooc, Chicago, IL GOGO} Rior Cpinsiows Avot Onhes May 8, 20/2 Consvicten Sor Attempt Gest Aegree murcler anol there! use of a weapop by a Shops, Whilesio/e County, LL, /I-CF237 September 30,2 O1S™ Acored Habitual Leimival chose vacate?! on Speedy tial violation; Reople Vv. Hop Kias Sols Tt Aye) 13056s-U, Copvictjop for Abempt fist begree pruder AO met Moech 30° 2016 Depieol leave to Appeal fo Tilinors Suuprert] Couct on cemaining Copvictiops, Apei! 7 20) 7 Post Conviction Dewie Au ust ef ZOZO A, ellole Court Nemec, Heviol, of fast caviton). fel, / Reople v. Hopkins 2020 It Ayy GA) 170253 2 7 | Tab| oe OF Audho rities Cytel Cases Reople v. Hopkins, 2020 Lt App Bob) 170253 eople Vv. Hopkins 20157 FL Ay Bf)/305¢S-U eles v, Aiken 434 US, 2ll C1999) Millec-El v, Cockrell, 537 48. 322 (2003) Pople v. lWooobAll, 219 TI, 2A lol, (2006) Feople uv. Correa, 08 Lil, 2 SI (194¢5-) feople v. SLC, Us LIL24 33 0986) Rople v, Rerocl 3/6 II/ Aga el 718 (5 7 Dist Joo) Backer v, Lie 20 IO7T US, s/¥ (1972) Rople v. Rea! 27 TM 26 264 (1963) ople v.Lykes 124 Dl Ag, sof LOY (32D st 1984) Pople v. Bech }ielo G2 TI) Ayal 754 (3% Dist 1978) Rople U, Hills rays, 329 Lf/ Ay, sb )i so (F2 Dish 202) Slatutes 22STLCS SH03-S (20/0) 730 TILES 5/3F-/0 Qo/o) 730 ILECS 5/3-%-/0 (2010) 3 : : | Dasis os Jucisthetior . Seeting LS, Supreme Couct review o& the okepial oF Rast Gyyichiond celi& upotec the. Tilwois fast Conviction Hearings Act Jacischet ion fs Coprertect on this Court by US, Sy. Cf Rules 109 apob 13 ()-The state Court LecisjoP Vas a tine/ edljuctscatios> per Liliwois Past Coprictioy Hearivog Act. Quill the Aowia / cops licts | with the Due rocess Clause ob the lbritet ‘States Covstit-tor Amenchire wt XM Constitubjopal Provisions Avot” Statuctes WiteA States Constitution AnepolrestXV ' 72S TILES s//03-S (2010) 730 Iles sfs¥-10 (20/2) 730 TLCS 5/3-¥: 10 (20/0) : | Statement OF Facts febbrower Was Serving a tera oF manolatory Super Visex release CG MSR ) OA a previous UNE hfe? cobichiors wheas on July J 2off, he | Was chargeot” iw Whi besidhe Counshy via. iabormation with the Menses | of atfenyot to Commit Gest ofegree muucter awool’ ‘facmect viokesce, Reople ~v. Hopkivs, 2020 IL App. 30) |70253,73. The same oly, Whites tole | Coumly issueol Qps arcest warrant (oc belbropec based’ on the atengtect Murclec Qn oeme viokpce chaege. Hopk INS, LO2QO iL Aye (3/1 70 253 73 The Lhhiwois Depactment of Corrections CO Dac) ako issueotap arrest warrant Sc ao MSR vioktiow, LC A joint group heaolecl by the Usiteo/ States lecshals arcestet febitiomer iw Chicago OW July 2920! Th, 73 Rh towec received toe MSR violation oe detaiwed id @ Gok Curly olebesbious Gester, On | August 220), the DOC recomped! Latitioper i one oe. ids focilbies (or the ISP, viokatjo,s uwtil be was released? iwto the custooky oy Whites; Cuwly on December 2 AOff Subs equerty, RA tower apentet iw Couct He plec# ot wily, cera sheA a Jaty trial avol was opp elstec! coupsel. On Dow ke G AC/] the Stale was aware the Petitioner CkeS 2 speecnty -trial clemanol, Tol | Oe December 13 20/] Fhe State How chacget He Rebtower with ad foval ofleuses of aggravated Ascharge ofa Crearn vel ups lavssuul USE ofa Weapon by @ Sel. Tol, 74 Cys NMecch, FO 20/2, the State Gle av anrewchl! Smosh charging Rebiboser with | belvg ap aerret habitual! Crimrival Tol ebitiower Cleo two Separate: probious to Asrniss, Leth basecl ons speay, trial Violations, Te, 75, He. acguedl the armel habitual criminal | ofouse Was subject fo Compu Ly Jolwoser ane Vhing fhe charge Ss | ater he had bee ip Custeay (or 2d obays violated his speecly trial eights. RA bower ako anguel, ‘all prevct