No. 20-8400

Daryl Wendell Barley v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: clear-and-convincing-evidence criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel evidence-standard first-step-act preponderance-of-evidence relevant-conduct sec-404 sentencing-reduction sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 'clear and convincing evidence standard' should be used instead of the 'preponderance of evidence standard' when determining the relevant conduct in a First Step Act Reduction Motion under Sec. 404

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the "clear and; convincing evidence standard" should be used instead of the wpreponderance of evidence standard" . ; when determining the revelant conduct in a First Step Act . Reduction Motion under Sec. 404? 2. Whether the Sixth Amendment protections for Effective Assisz. tance of Counsel are to be applied on the First Step Act ; Reduction Filings? , : : 3. Whether the Court should have Remanded for futher consideration : of the First Step Act Sec. 401 , 851 changes, seeing that the . Virginia prior used no longer qualifies today as a 851 predicate?

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Daryl Wendell Barley
Daryl Wendell Barley — Petitioner
Daryl Wendell Barley — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent