Whether the district court's reliance on hearsay evidence to impose a guideline sentence of life violates Ramos's right to confront and cross-examine witnesses under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the district court’s reliance on hearsay evidence to impose a guideline sentence of life violates Ramos’s right to confront and cross-examine witnesses under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as provided by Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), and this Court’s precedent, as most recently developed in United States v. Haymond, 588 U.S. (2019); 139 S. Ct. 2369 (2019)? ii