Bridget Brown Parson v. Select Portfolio Servicing, et al.
JusticiabilityDoctri
whether-the-appellees-can-make-false-statements-and-file-multiple-lawsuits
No question identified. : | MONETARILY AND THEN CHOSE TO FILE MANY LAWSUITS AND MAKE FALSE STATEMENTS BEFORE THE MANY JUDGES.? 6. CAN THE APPELLEE, U S§ BANK, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING NOT APPEAR IN THE BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING AND YET LATER STATE THAT THEY ARE OWED MONEY SINCE 2014? , | 7. THE AGREED ORDER IN BANKRUPTCY COURT WAS SIGNED IN 2015 BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE BARBARA HOUSER WHEN THE APPELLEES, US BANK AND SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING FAILRED TO APPEAR IN COURT IN 2016 IN WHICH A FALSE CLAIM WAS MADE THAT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE “BOGUS” LETTER MENTIONED ABOVE THQAT STATES THAT NO MONEY IS OWED AND THAT THE ACCOUNT IS IN GOOD STAINDING. | 8. DO THE APPELLANT, BRIDGET BROWN PARSON BELIEVE THE “BOGUS” LETTER THT HAS BEEN PROVEN TO BE FRAQUDULENT IN WHICH THE APPELLEES, U S BANK AND SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING HAVE BROUGHT THE SAME IDENTICAL CLAIM TO MANY COURTS SEEKING TO CONTINUE TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A BLACK AMERICAN AND FEMALE.? | 9. CAN THIS COURT MAKE A RULING ON THE “BOGUS” LETTER SIGNED IN DECEMBER } 2014 AND DISALLOW THE CONTINUED INCONSISTENT TACTICS OF APPEARINIG IN BD FAITH AND STATING TO THE MANY JUDGES AND JUSTICES THAT THE APPELLANT, BRIDGET BROWN PARSON IS IN ARREARAGES IN HER HOME MORTGAGE. 10. CAN THIS COURT MAKE A RULING THAT THE APPELLEES, U S BANK, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING ARE NOT THE ORIGINAL NOTE HOLDERS CANNOT PRODUCE THE NOTE IN WHCH THERE HAVE BEEN MANY “DOCTORED” DOCUMENTS FILED OVER AND OVER AGAIN IN WHICH THE ABUSE OF POWER OF THE APPELLEE, JUDGE HARLIN HALE HAVE JOINED IN WITH THE APPELLEES, U S BANK AND HAVE IGNORED THE AGREED ORDER SIGNED BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE BARBARA HOUSER WHO HAS SINCE RETIRED AND THE APPELLEE, HARLIN HALE HAVE BEEN SELECTED AS THE NEW CHIEFJUSTICE IN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT ALTHOUGH THE FILED JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT AND PENDING MOTIIONS FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF MORTGAGE DEBT IS | STILL PENDING. | 11. CAN THIS COURT MAKE A RULING TO ALLOW THE PENDING MOTONS IN LIMINE REGARDING HER MORTGAGE DEBT TO BE GRANTED IN WHICH THE APPELLEES FAILED TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEA AND HAVE THEREFORE COMMITTED DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN WHICH THERE IS A PER PERSON MONETARY JUDGMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,350,000.00 12. CAN THE JUDGE, HARLIN HALE STATE TO THE TYPING COURT REPORTER, A YOUNG BLACK FEMALE TO STOP THAT TYPING AND TO DISALLOW FAIR AND EQUAL JUSTICE | BY REFUSING TO ALLOW A FAIR AND EQUAL JUSTICE HEARING REGARDING THE | OBJECTIONS MAKE BY THE APPELLANT, BRIDGET PARSON? | 13, HAVE THE APPELLEES, U S BANK AND SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING COMMITTED AGGRAVATED PERJURY BY STATING THAT THE NOTICE OF DEFAULT WAS SENT OUT TO THE APPELLANT, BRIDGET PARSON WHEN ACTUALLY N O NOTICE WAS EVER SENT TO HER REGARDING HER MORTGAGE? THIS FALSE STATEMENT CONTINUES TO BE PLACED WITHITN MANY COURT DOCUMENTS. 14. HAVE THE JUDGE HARLIN HALE JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OF A “CD” BE USED IN WHICH THE REQUEST WAS MADE BY THE APPELLANT, BRIDGET BROWN PARSON THAT HAS BEEN PENDING SINCE 2018? 15. CAN THE JUDGE HARLIN HALE TELEPHONE THE POLICE AND/OR SECURITY TO THE COURT ROOM WHEN HE DOES NOT LILKE THE OBJECTIONS MADE BY THE APPELLANT, BRIDGET BROWN PARSON, IN AN IMPROMPTU HEARING WITHOUT ANY NOTICE NORA RIGHT TO ILLEGALLY DETAIN HER? 16. IS