1. NO RESPONSE BY ANY OF THE APPELLEES IN THIS CASE TO THE LAWSUIT REGARDING THE ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD, CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND THE FACT THAT THE APPELLEES, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING AND U S BANK ARE NOT THE ORIGINAL NOTE HOLDERS, CANNOT PRODUCE THE NOTE AND THAT HER HOME SHOULD BE EXPUNGEMENT OF HER MORTGAGE DEBT IN WHICH THERE ARE "DOCTORED " DOCUMENTS AND THE APPELLEES, HAVE REFUSED TO INTENTIONALLY ANSWER BUT YET HAVE CONTINUED TO VIOLATE THE BANKRUPTCY CASE FILED IN ACTIVE BANKRUPTCY AND HARASS HER IN THE LOWER COURTS AS WELL AS THE HIGHER AND APPEALS COURTS. NO RESPONSE SHOULD EQUATE TO THE ENTIRE MONETARY SANCTIONS PER PERSON OF $4,350,000.00.

2. DOES THE NO RESPONSE FROM THE APPELLEES CONSTITUTES THAT A DEFAULT JUDGMENT HAS OCCURRED AND THE MONETARY SANCTIONS REQUESTED PER PERSON AND PROFESSIONALLY IS DUE IMMEDIATELY AND PAYABLE TO THE APPELLANT, BRIDGET PARSON, AKA BRIDGET BROWN PARSON. FAILURE TO RESPOND TO THE LAWSUIT IN THE APPEALS COURT HAS SHOWWN THE LACK OF RESPECT FOR FAIR AND EQUAL JUSTICE AND DISALLOWS FAIR AND EQUAL JUSTICE IN WHICH THE MONETARY SANCTIONS ARE DUE THAT HAVE BEEN PENDING SINCE 2014 THAT IS SOME SEVEN YEARS.

3. THE "BOGUS " LETTER GIVEN TO THE APPELLANT, BRIDGET BROWN PARSON, AKA BRIDGET PARSON IN BAD FAITH TO DECEIVE A BLACK AMERICAN AND FEMALE AND TO DISALLOW FAIR ND EQUAL JUSTICE IN WHICH THE MANY ATTEMPTS TO STEAL THE REAL PROPERTY IS STILL ON-GOING NOW IN WHICH APPELLANT, BRIDGET PARSON HAS RESIDED INSIDE HER HOME FOR SOME THIRTY-TWO YEARS AND HER SPOUSE DIED INSIDE OF THE HOME IN WHICH THE APPELLANT, BRIDGET BROWN PARSON IS A WIDOW.

4. THE ACTIONS AND INACTIONS OF THE APPELLEES, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING AND U S BANK TO DISALLOW IN THE MANY LAWSUITS FILED AND PENDING THAT THEY ARE SEPARATE AND NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE LOAN SERVICER, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING DOES THAT CONSTITUTE FRAUD, MISREPRESENTATION AND DISALLOW FAIR AND EQUAL JUSTIC;E? U S BANK, APPELLEE USES AND CONTINUES TO USE THE FALSE DOCUMENTATION AND FACTS FROM THE LOAN SERVICER, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICER BUT CONTINUES TO ON SOME LAWSUIT DOCUMENTS IN THE ORIGINAL PETITION TO "INTENTIONALLY " NOT LIST THE LOAN SERVICER, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVIXCING WHO HAS MANY INACCURATE ACCOUNTING THAT HAS BEEN MENTIONED SINCE 2014. THE "BOGUS " LETTER MENTIONED ABOVE CONTINUES TO STATE THAT NO FEES ARE DUE AND THAT NOTHING SHOULD BE WORRIED ABOUT FROM THE APPELLANT, BRIDGET BROWN PARSON BUT THEY CONTINUE TO THROUGH DECEPTTION, FRAUD, MISREPRESENTATION TO DISALLOW FAIR AND EQUAL JUSTICE.

5. CAN THE

whether-the-appellees-can-make-false-statements-and-file-multiple-lawsuits