No. 20-8426

Bin Yang v. California Board of Registered Nursing

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-06-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection expert-testimony government-agency government-misconduct licensing-board standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why is Petitioner NOT ALLOWED to withdraw her application from a nursing-board

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented “. 1. Why is Petitioner NOT ALLOWED to withdraw her application from a nursing | board (quit) while she could do so from medical boards? | 2. Why is Petitioner not allowed to have “a mental exam” from a university expert who can best ensure public safety but “the expert” who will say anything that Respondent desires? 3. Is it unconstitutional for licensing agents to set innocent up with “their experts,” AGAIN AND AGAIN, causing tremendous personal and family losses and suffering? 4. Is it unconstitutional for the justice system to actively and inactively assist the government agencies to violate law, set innocents up, legalize their crime, and get paid, AGAIN AND AGAIN? | | | | | | 2 : PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Bin Yang vs. The Board of Registered Nursing p 7 Il.

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-16
Waiver of right of respondent California Board of Registered Nursing to respond filed.
2021-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Bin Yang
Bin Yang — Petitioner
California Board of Registered Nursing
Diann SokoloffOffice of the Attorney General-Dept. of Justice, Respondent