No. 20-8428

Joseph George v. M. Eliot Spearman, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence expert-testimony sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the evidence and expert testimony presented at trial was sufficient to satisfy the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : ) | : QUEStIOn G) PRESESTED hoes fal eviclesce Anic/ expeet Lot tesS PersvReS Hestimony Hralleged yWichin subtered A-fpnctisee.of fhe Zygonutic hibfress qualify Soa+heSchl upp docteiter Chas REASO warble vest-trl Lebbatsbele Hate pet Monier | Staked A Cousttothin tad claiin by She preosecetlars USI PIERS URCA testintony Ansel Paleeviclentee a£ysry Speial P . ° : IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. | OPINIONS BELOW i For cases from federal courts: , The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Joseph George
Joseph George — Petitioner
Joseph George — Petitioner