No. 20-8443
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure defendant-statement due-process evidence jury-charge jury-instructions motion-to-quash photographic-evidence right-to-counsel state-created-impediment trial-court-discretion
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
ERISA DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court erred in admitting the defendant's statement, denying the motion to quash the superseding indictment, admitting speculative photos, and including the State's requested jury charge
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ESTION() PRESENTED 1. Did the Louisiana Supreme Court errar in denying review after a State-created impediment occurred? 2. Whether the trial court erred in admitting defendant's statement al trial? 3. Whether the trial court erred in denying the Motion to Quash the superseding short ; form indictment? : 4. Whether the trial court erred in admitting speculative photos? 5. Whether the trial court erred in including the Mate's requested jury charge? z
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2021-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Jacobie A. Green
Jacobie A. Green — Petitioner
Louisiana
Shae Gary McPhee Jr. — Louisiana Department of Justice, Respondent