No. 20-8444
Dustin Melvin Davison v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: autonomy constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defendant-autonomy defense-counsel due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel guilt-concession right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-strategy
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it unconstitutional to allow defense counsel to concede any aspect of guilt over defendant's unambiguously expressed desire to maintain actual innocence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is it unconstitutional to allow defense counsel to concede any aspect of guilt over defendant’s unambiguously expressed desire to maintain actual innocence? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-29
Brief of respondent Oklahoma in opposition filed.
2021-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Dustin Davison
Andrea Digilio Miller — Petitioner
Oklahoma