Michael Izell Seals v. K. Allison, et al.
Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing
No question identified. : died ekend x QUESTIONS rehab esbton ph (i OF Cerracty\ chor — pon on, Ce" Cas” 2013 2 Pr ae Za ne be 0) dd rong Ziniclas onrtormbay, “efontonts! Wolke om enttubond fi: Gate. Sete , (big? toe — La” on ore By 22 fo be ee enc ES 2 ROWS be ib — Lxbe. OF &-ZIr ee re ae ee Wide gal eV, GY A oY 2G Y Anew! AEES pope : Wease Bee. Sodicial ors ULE lfos eed aia | , reithefion Bese oe brs SF pnt Hel Dok gapinst Che p Minnie opel Lari “Kwoveral' on— on9” Ve one, se? fy Motion, — Anpelonty Fok Fe es ee ie | | 4 fi AE KA a, Lau rpccrit hy EI ty : 5 rep Yo fredk LE BEALL Be Gn were Ne Mie On pin Gi CO iy ALE ; eo