No. 20-8465
Felipe Ambriz-Valdovinos v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8-cfr-1003.14 8-usc-1229 administrative-procedure circuit-split immigration-law immigration-proceedings jurisdiction notice-to-appear statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the Court resolve the circuit split on whether a notice to appear in immigration proceedings must comply with the statutory definition of a notice to appear under 8 U.S.C. § 1229 in order to vest jurisdiction in an immigration court under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.14?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Should the Court resolve the circuit split on whether a notice to appear in immigration proceedings must comply with the statutory definition of a notice to appear under 8 U.S.C. § 1229 in order to vest jurisdiction in an immigration court under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.14? prefix
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2021)
Attorneys
Felipe Ambriz-Valdovinos
Michael Marks — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
Michael Marks — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent