Whether the contaminated exonerating evidence was misused to convict

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Questitn 4) WHETHER The FNCLosep PNA REPtAT AND Raw DATA (ScieNTIAC PROOF} THAT CONTAMINATED [EXONERATING EYENCE was MisvseD To ConyicT Mey 49 tNoveH To Dismiss, my INDICTMENT / WERTURN MY CONVICTION 79 ; Question 2 ) WHETHER THE ; (UN) QUALIFICATIONS OF DNA EXPERTS , ENComPLeTE CHAIN OF CUSTODY | PNA EXTRACTION — PRoce DURES i DNA QUANTIFICATION PROCEDNRES , DNA PCA AMP( (FICATION PRoceDURES , NEGATE Conrgur/ REAGENT fLank PRocePuRES, —[EAMoReD] PHA REFORTING Guvetines (igrunes) (Exaseo] ONA RepeRTiNVG GUIDE LINES ( STUTTER) | PeRTURED DNA TeoTiMoy quo P80 PNA LABS [rie] tNTENT 7 FS ENovGH TO Phwve TIT «= SPSU PNA OLAB OYILATED «ETS WN AND conaness’? «= TESTING GUIDELINE 5 , Tivs VALIDATING «= THE wspes AND CoA 8 PLAIN ERROR OF OVERLOOKING The Nec) For neversar [ 9IsMiss AL 7)