Whether the Plaintiff was provided notice timely of the Summary Judgement ruling?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The EEO, and Title VII Act of 1964 makes it unlawful for an employee to discriminate against any employee or applicant, regardless of race, color, age, sex, religion or national origin. 1.) Whether the Plaintiff was provided notice timely of the Summary. Judgement ruling? Hn . 2.) Whether plaintiff was provided a proper or fair chance to have her Motion to Dismiss . Counsel and be properly represented? 3.) Whether the Six Circuit Court of Appeals should have denied Plaintiff the right to a fair Appeal after being informed of an untimely notice to the Plaintiff? 4.) Whether the Defendant provided reasonable accommodations for Plaintiff's Religious practice; Whereas, it eliminated all conflict between the employee’s religious practice? And it did not cause a hardship on the department? 5.) In telling the Plaintiff she “would not” be considered except she exhaust all paid time off? Except Plaintiff be required to choose between whether she would rather have accrued vacation off or do religious work? : 6.) Whether Religious Observance or services are limited to only one day off? 7.) Whether coercion of other members of Management and Human Resources is unlawful to prevent an employee form having Religious time off is unlawful? 8.) Whether Defendant should not consider and be governed by company policy that had been utilized for fifteen years in granting Religious Observance? Plaintiff be required to . exhaust all days with paid vacation time or not be approved to take off without pay as stated by company policy? 9.) Whether the Defendant should have properly trained management for Sexual Harassment prevention and correction? Diversity? And Religious Observance; whereas it continued for two years? ; 10.) Whether the Defendant took reasonable steps to correct or prevent (2 counts) Sexual Harassment? (2 counts) Religious Observance? Should Plaintiff have been allowed to endure Sexual Harassment for more than a year? 11.) Should six clergymen be afforded better accommodation for religious services and : pretices than one clergywoman? 12.) Whether it’s right to deprive a U.S, citizen of her right to reasonable religious accommodations? And protection and prevention for sexual harassment?