Does the continual refusal of the Federal Court System to address the judicially noticeable fact that the Petitioner has been Tortured and has suffered lasting injury as a result, violate the Petitioner's Constitutional Rights and/or International Rights?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the continual refusal of the Federal Court System (District and Circuit Court of Appeals) to address the judicially noticeable fact that the Petitioner has been Tortured and has suffered lasting injury as a result, as pled in his complaint(s) and associated pleadings, violate the Plaintiffs United States Constitutional Rights and/or his International Rights under The Geneva Conventions against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment? The Petitioner notes that the Federal Courts are charged with the issue of Torture as it is a Federal Crime as well as an International Crime. 2. Does the continual and continued disenfranchisement of the Petitioner by the Federal Court System (District and Circuit Court of Appeals), as irrefutably evidenced in the Petitioner’s Federal Court Cases, violate the Petitioner’s Constitutional Rights or other Rights conferred upon the Petitioner? 8. Does the well-evidenced fact that the Federal District Court of Maine’s decision in this case, and the First Circuit's subsequent upholding of that decision, is in conflict with multiple instances of United States Supreme Court case law designed to protect Pro Se litigants from abuse by The Courts mean that the Federal Courts have abused their discretion?