No. 20-86
Charles Daniels, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections, et al. v. Ronald Ross
Tags: but never mentioned in his original federal habeas petition to supply th civil-procedure court-order federal-habeas federal-rules-civil-procedure habeas habeas-corpus habeas-petition mayle-v-felix relation-back statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(c) permits a habeas petitioner to rely on a state court order appended to, but never mentioned in, his original federal habeas petition to satisfy the relation-back standard
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(c) permits a habeas petitioner to rely on a state court order appended to, but never mentioned in, his original federal habeas petition to supply the core operative facts necessary to satisfy the relation-back standard set forth in Mayle v. Felix, 544 U.S. 644 (2005).
Docket Entries
2020-11-09
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-20
Reply of petitioners Charles Daniels, Director, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-10-06
Brief of respondent Ronald Ross in opposition filed.
2020-10-06
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Ronald Ross.
2020-08-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 27, 2020 to October 9, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 9, 2020.
2020-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Charles Daniels, Director, et al.
Heidi Jill Parry Stern — Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Petitioner
Ronald Ross