No. 20-860
Ryan Randall Gilbertson v. United States
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-restitution due-process jury jury-determination procedural-due-process reasonable-doubt sentencing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment prohibits a court from imposing criminal restitution on a defendant based on facts not found by the jury beyond a reasonable doubt
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Sixth Amendment prohibits a court from imposing criminal restitution on a defendant based on facts not found by the jury beyond a reasonable doubt. (1)
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-06-01
Reply of petitioner Ryan Gilbertson filed. (Distributed)
2021-05-14
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2021-04-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 14, 2021. (Docket entry corrected 4/8/21)
2021-04-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 14, 2021 to May 14, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 14, 2021.
2021-03-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 15, 2021 to April 14, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-11
Response Requested. (Due March 15, 2021)
2021-01-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-12-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Ryan Gilbertson
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent