No. 20-862

Hui Feng, et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-30
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: antifraud-provisions broker-registration capital-raising investment-advisers-act-of-1940 sec-authority secondary-market secondary-market-transactions securities-act securities-exchange-act securities-exchange-act-of-1934 statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
ERISA Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the SEC exceeded its statutory authority

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The questions presented are: 1. Whether the SEC exceeded its statutory authority under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which regulates secondary market transactions in securities on exchanges and the over-the-counter markets, by applying the Exchange Act’s broker registration requirements to Petitioners who had no involvement with secondary market transactions. 2. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in finding that Petitioners violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws when the basis for the finding is Petitioners’ alleged breach of an attorney ethics rule and when the alleged misconduct was only tangentially related to purchases or sales of securities. 3. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in finding “scienter” and “materiality” in this case. i

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-22
Waiver of right of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission to respond filed.
2020-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 29, 2021)

Attorneys

Hui Feng, et al.
Robert G. HeimTarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP, Petitioner
Robert G. HeimTarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP, Petitioner
Securities and Exchange Commission
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent