Whether this Court should use its discretion through 28 U.S.C. §1651(a) and governing law of Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944) to provide relief, including default judgment, vacating lower court decisions (including legal fees and costs), which both affirmed summary judgment and concluded that defendants did not commit fraud on the court?

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether this Court should use its discretion through 28 U.S.C. §1651(a) and governing law of Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944) to provide relief, including default judgment, vacating lower court decisions (including legal fees and costs), which both affirmed summary judgment and concluded that defendants did not commit fraud on the court?